{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmVcwqzdwCFxQbWZgrPrJBGXsKJ26ASmvXYJh8FuGsCJeF","content":"Hey [@EzioRed](14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh-polkadot) and [@OpenSquare/Yongfeng](14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb-polkadot),\n\nThank you for sharing your concerns, I am happy to clarify it for you in detail:\n**I believe it’s clear by now that AI tools (which many of us already use daily) can significantly increase productivity across almost any use case.**\n\nFor Polkadot governance, developing a customized AI is not about replacing processes but about **optimizing existing manual workflows**. In the MVP, we focused on three user stories I personally encountered as a bounty curator:\n\n1. Comparing proposals between bounty submissions and treasury submissions\n2. Running quick accountability checks\n3. Sourcing off-chain bounty submissions into one UI and comparing them with on-chain treasury submissions\n\nThe potential impact is tangible: using Clarys.AI could increase DV and curator efficiency by up to 300%, save over 120,000 hours of work and reduce costs by an estimated $6M in treasury work/time budget savings.\n\nWe’d be genuinely interested to hear more on your perspective. What makes you still feel that AI may not bring meaningful optimization to current manual workflows?","contentType":"markdown","commenterNetwork":"polkadot","version":"2","timestamp":1757024823},"address":"146ZZqm2cMHLf3ju7oc8M9JnPaAktuADAKThagKnXqzjPJbZ","signature":"0x3abadf3de23cc14fa1c9b46c7f030b288fcbcd1c84ac3f573d14a101abb5550be576ea0f622ee275226790f3876ef5ac8a26abdc5809d955add01ff519e86e87","version":"2"}