{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmPy4dQatqgFd9gAbcGpAwdqCPbfgMkXSPPaHBfg4vYyKj","choices":["Nay"],"remark":"I would like to elaborate on this point to be clear. \nPersonally, I am concerned about these types of proposals, where I see resources being allocated and development being focused around OpenGov, just OpenGov.\nThere is a marked tendency to invest significantly in tools and structures designed to enhance internal governance, which I believe ends up diverting our focus from the main objective: to encourage the construction of disruptive applications and use cases on Polkadot.\nWe are already seeing a proliferation of proposals for the integration of Artificial Intelligence for the interpretation of proposals, the establishment of foundations for legal compliance, and a proliferation of utilities whose primary purpose is to refine voting and deliberation mechanisms. While robust governance is essential, the saturation of redundant tools that converge on similar objectives makes me see a potential inefficiency in the use of funds.","voterNetwork":"polkadot","remarkType":"markdown","version":"4","timestamp":1760041808},"address":"14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh","signature":"0x3ef78c52a4d8bed9d72f47d5c3554f0f25739da1ffc918bfc599e54b4200505ea02e99f6a363e240d3761c2aaa3a935e6d7d6e7939e694bfb44d9ddf6c65e58e","version":"2"}