{"data":{"proposalCid":"Qme3jkfQh7crdiS96mFdiXrPBd3bNPwNPZtnZXDhrMqogi","content":"Thanks for everybody reply — but I believe we need to look deeper and more critically at what’s happening.\n\n1. **In Polkadot, the $DED meme coin *also* temporarily increased transaction volume.** It was funded with **over $1 million** from the treasury and ended in **complete failure**. A few more transactions don’t justify **misallocated resources** — especially when trust and transparency are at stake.\n\n2. Regarding Acala: **projects like DAMN and NEMO, self-labeled as memes**, have already received **over 600,000 ACA** — first through treasury proposals, then again in the previous Meme & dApp round.  \n📎 DamnDAO’s previous request to treasury: https://forum.acala.network/t/proposal-for-supporting-damndao-on-acala/2594\n\n3. It's **on-chain verifiable** that these same projects have used **part of the funds for self-voting**. This isn’t community-driven, it’s **self-reinforcing** — creating the illusion of popularity by gaming the system.  \nProof: https://opensquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmbL8NKjmVXeFHXYksaESqZ4D7n3L2JUxzbEGvE7BreMHJ  \nMain wallet: `26aJsv3J1KsDGcC2nXmiXpuT4atahG1JHGLDvRffcFnYvGCV`\n\nYes, memecoins are meant to be fun — but **they shouldn’t make a joke out of Acala’s investors**, who fund the treasury through **inflation and transaction fees**. We should **encourage organic traction**, not artificially manufactured hype with public funds.\n\nLet’s not repeat the mistakes we've already seen elsewhere. It’s not about being anti-meme — it’s about being **pro-integrity**.\n","contentType":"markdown","commenterNetwork":"acala","version":"2","timestamp":1743426867},"address":"25dYbWSSKyRwet33w16zcYEUHpTJEpu7fXs5vJr3EDHqZduA","signature":"0x22c12c1512ae986eb59a5f49e838245d0f9edc532dea59c188a382b22b5c067c0c0fef148a47531510a10cadac0757657cabe57f7d791d6bca8d3ad189651d87","version":"2"}