{"data":{"proposalCid":"Qma9jqZErwSqmoM7rmmi3KV5WU1X5uW6xohJZim64LxQ7h","choices":["Nay"],"remark":"The idea of legal support for new and existing teams is valuable, but I have to nay this proposal for several reasons. Firstly, I agree with Mario's comments that Amforc being both the curator and executor creates a clear conflict of interest. Secondly, there are several critical gray areas in the proposal that leave important decisions to the curators' subjective opinions. One example is the total allocatable hours per team, which allows for a \"potential for adjustments based on specific needs and priorities and depending on curator approval.\" Additionally, \"the ultimate decision over eligibility for and scope of support lies with the bounty and its curators.\" If such gray areas are going to be open to the subjective opinions of the curators, a broader curator set consisting of multiple Polkadot-native entities (individuals, companies, DAOs) should be assigned to the bounty. I also agree with a number of comments suggesting that there should be lawyers on the curator board.","voterNetwork":"polkadot","version":"4","timestamp":1736243921},"address":"15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL","signature":"0xaec2f5b2141670dff6975ac8e68d36381513ca99ab647766874f4f199707592439a24e60ca46e7dcf3d3bab950c92930222810542bd8665d07a9802ec3851185","version":"2"}