{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmcQv8aFfUnseu1yUXyhNqM4wdL9Vxx2dVMwRNafcV43Nd","choices":["Nay"],"remark":"While I'm not too pessimistic about ink! and applaud the effort of the curators to increase its adoption in the ecosystem, I share some of the concerns under the proposal.\n\nSpecifically, I think it's a good idea to consolidate smart contract efforts in the ecosystem under a single bounty, which would mean either absorption of Bounty 19 or its dissolution. Given that there has only been 26 child bounties (including curator payments) of 19, I think the concerns are valid when saying that the adoption is limited. I think given the historic data, it might be a good idea to scale back on the bounty's budget and ask for top ups when funds are spent. This would also allow changing the perspective of the community with short term results if activity if high with the launch of Polkadot Hub.","voterNetwork":"polkadot","remarkType":"markdown","version":"4","timestamp":1759833329},"address":"12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3","signature":"0xfafbfd1e8fcd209cf2b330c68a3e6ad8d07fb6e67c8ac5a5ad9b43d003794e4f7eb5bb8b1b8f6215878e696d47cf6b4f3e6dd858c59fd71be2f5cf18cf69598b","version":"2"}