{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmcqC2LL2HwcaPcBMmMSw4cCPxaQsbinMTuR7NnY75Cd6Y","content":"# Suspicious in the Top 3: RealVerse, Damn, and Boomerang\n\nThe integrity of the top 3 projects is under serious threat. **RealVerse**, **Damn**, and **Boomerang** have climbed the ranks through **questionable voting behavior** and **lack genuine contributions** to the Acala ecosystem.\n\n## 🚨 What’s Really Behind These Projects?\n\n### RealVerse  \n- Nothing more than a **in essence static webpage**.  \n- **No real functionality**, **no social media presence**, and **no Discord community**.  \n- Vote patterns show clear signs of **wallet farming**.  \n\n###  Damn  \n- Previously attempted to pass as a memecoin — a move that suggests **intent to mislead** rather than build.\n- Marketed as a **community-driven DAO**, but with **no **, innovation,\n- Backed largely by **self-voting and farmed wallets**.  \n- Lacks transparency, clarity, and tangible results. It’s a hollow presence draining collective resources.\n\n### Boomerang  \n- Poses as a meme and token launchpad, but **has no proven value** or utility.  \n- Voting shows recurring use of the **same suspicious wallets**.  \n- Its behavior disrespects Acala’s values and mocks the spirit of a fair ecosystem.\n\n---\n\n## ⚠️ Why This Matters\n\nThese projects are not just flawed—they’re **actively compromising Acala’s credibility** and **diverting treasury funds away** from real builders and innovators.\n\nWe **must protect the community**, ensure a **level playing field**, and **prioritize substance over hype**.\n\n**Let’s keep Acala strong, honest, and future-focused.**\n\n\n# Restoring Fairness: A Humble Proposal for the Good of Acala\n\nAs an individual investor in Acala, I share as a **call for open discussion** and **constructive solutions**. I believe we all want a healthy ecosystem where real builders thrive and community trust grows.\n\n## 💬 My Suggestions for Restoring Integrity\n\n### 1. Recalculate Votes to Filter Out Farming Behavior  \nI propose recalculating the current vote counts by **excluding repeated wallet patterns**. This would help identify artificial support and bring clarity to what real community backing looks like.\n\n### 2. Consider Quadratic Voting  \nTo promote fairer outcomes, I suggest exploring **quadratic voting**, which limits the impact of concentrated votes and **favors broader community participation** over vote farming or whale dominance.\n\n### 3. Require Basic Community Presence  \nIn my opinion, a project without **any active Twitter/X or Discord engagement** should not be eligible for funding. **Verified social interaction** should be a baseline indicator of seriousness and commitment.\n\n---\n\n## 🧭 Why I Share This\n\nI share these ideas not to attack any project or person, but to **protect the treasury**, **support honest developers**, and help Acala remain a place where true innovation is rewarded.\n\nI humbly open this discussion to the community. If there are better ideas or refinements to these, I welcome them. Let’s make sure Acala grows with integrity.\n","contentType":"markdown","commenterNetwork":"acala","version":"2","timestamp":1746042511},"address":"224ddyiYafE6vH79hhFuxgWT8hJ12pvTEjB3Cax8eqY4QgG5","signature":"0x8e08137052c0eb82d318ae16cfa6ddbdf69d764fbb4bb89c2ca93b4342e3303bb282732107ec893d81285a30f32516db2bdb1baf0008807b5450eb1e0d923589","version":"2"}