{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmRPjggpyULKNqW6WxsepSFQnwFYuWVytKWfkXkT7TkmHp","choices":["Nay"],"remark":"I'll put the same comments I had on the subwallet proposal here as I have pretty much the same opinion, maybe a bit more biased towards Nova as I've been a happy user since years but still.\n\nThis is a very good example on why similar proposals should be funded around the same time, we have funded both Talisman and SubWallet with similar proposals. Now, in my opinion arguing that since we funded them we SHOULDN'T fund Nova since it's now too much money spent on wallets or we SHOULD fund them since Talisman and Subwallet were funded doesn't hold water for the same reason. We really need to have dedicated months for similar, especially high budget, proposals so that holders can evaluate the money being spent more clearly.\n\nAt this point we're pouring millions of DOT into these wallets, been doing so for years, I see very little effort to explore other commercial avenues from both (why would you when coming back to treasury gets you a cool $1M each time?)\n\nSo maybe a good time start signalling that.\n\n","voterNetwork":"polkadot","remarkType":"markdown","version":"4","timestamp":1755937671},"address":"12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3","signature":"0x825f86a57f02688ec1f2941c45a8c89d443d6b4950c6aeed34fee1c0092182585615c7b31932ce0b3bf16332b87e80e9d71dccb698bc722d7fb2a671954bec8b","version":"2"}