{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmSyXeE1tHGaGJfjzu9iwtUQRbpdHTUbqKwpXKKDEWAvss","choices":["Close the bounty."],"remark":"So I gave the Legal Bounty a try for a UX Bounty project (a crypto tax tool with local compliance needs), but the experience was not what I’d hope for. \n\nBeyond using Discord, which is already a questionable choice for a legal-focused group, the bigger issue was the clunky onboarding process. It was unclear, extensive, and involved multiple steps just to get to a point where I could even ask for high level guidance. It felt like far more friction than needed.\n\nAdding to that, requiring contributors to personally sign legally binding documents before any discussion around a bounty project even begins puts too much risk on individuals and discourages participation. After weeks of this back and forth process (asking for clarity on how to proceed with discussions/next steps), the conversations simply never got off the ground. Instead, we decided to hold off on any legal considerations until a solution is delivered by teams we are in discussions with on this topic, but the process was eye-opening. \n\nFrom my perspective, the Legal Bounty in its current form isn’t serving contributors well. I wouldn’t recommend continuing it, as treasury resources could be put toward programs that are more open, accessible, and user-friendly from the start.","voterNetwork":"polkadot","remarkType":null,"version":"4","timestamp":1759061872},"address":"12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ","signature":"0x94bc3de0357e90d72aba21deaa1ff6847ec448fc99d33f492e49d1d9dad9821ddd63d587e5a92a0a4cbaa6a73ef75091b071d8cad32f9730e9859d7787426a83","version":"2"}