{"data":{"proposalCid":"QmSyXeE1tHGaGJfjzu9iwtUQRbpdHTUbqKwpXKKDEWAvss","choices":["Close the bounty."],"remark":"I did not have any direct experience with the legal bounty team, mainly because our own legal concerns have been covered in the past by our own legal counsel. To use it as a pool to pay for individual consultation seems to complicated, due to the nature of legal teams working with contracts etc, like stated above. Would imho make sense to keep alive only if there was a clear agenda, what we would really need as outcomes, actually helping the entire community, so individual work gets less. Example: When teams look for issuance of token in EU, to get a framework and action plan delivered, which shows what kind of legal and accountability requirements have to be met as well as the type of documentation – which is to a certain degree standardaises now in case of MiCA. Most legal refuse to admit, that most of the general tasks involved with token launches or legal entities are pretty standardised. My expectation of a working group and bounty like this would be, to deliver to a certain degree processes and examples or templated, to make a founders life easier. I vote close the bounty.","voterNetwork":"polkadot","remarkType":null,"version":"4","timestamp":1759138024},"address":"14dgsNsaz5TXC1s1vX9emwVwhPaCfjjaCciMYAUd1CK7TdtF","signature":"0x8287b3d96efbaac2982eedb91b092db6a659c8d797e278aa8d3d0548002b2e2476e72ad1d244917db7cdf5af6e3213fdb91257e2541b7371eac05caf54bf778d","delegators":null,"version":"2"}