{"data":{"proposalCid":"Qme8cdnR29iQcK5wWf9rksmAq3VgokjnVjeKgLybk8vjgn","choices":["Nay"],"remark":"Although I find the idea of a \"composite\" index token interesting, there are a number of issues with the proposal that's pushing me toward a nay. First, the curator (list) should be transparent at the moment of the establishment of the bounty. Second, I'm having a hard time understanding why the treasury should fund all the legal and operational work related to the incorporation of the Swiss entity. Legal bounty can be utilized for this purpose, and they specialize in Swiss law as far as I know. Even the minimum capital downpayment is included in the proposal. Technically, JAM-related development is included in the proposal. JAM is still quite far away from public availability. So, JAM-related development costs seem premature. To repeat, I do find the idea interesting, but the proposal is not filling in the blanks for me.","voterNetwork":"polkadot","version":"4","timestamp":1749362759},"address":"15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL","signature":"0xcad41bb5ebc1ef401d0d5e3e52dc966641180bc3a968fc11175a29c109648e6b8ed087d93bc1b2abc54e253fcf3642e84acd51b26b9fb2e89cc92ce897574287","version":"2"}